<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.english-linguistics.de/grammarparadise/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Constraint-based_Syntax_2%3A_Week_7</id>
	<title>Constraint-based Syntax 2: Week 7 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.english-linguistics.de/grammarparadise/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Constraint-based_Syntax_2%3A_Week_7"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.english-linguistics.de/grammarparadise/wiki/index.php?title=Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_7&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-11T08:15:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.39.12</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.english-linguistics.de/grammarparadise/wiki/index.php?title=Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_7&amp;diff=1221&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Gert: Created page with &quot;  So far, we have only looked at sentences with Subject-Verb-Complement(s) order. However, under certain circumstances English also permits sentences where some constituent th...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.english-linguistics.de/grammarparadise/wiki/index.php?title=Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_7&amp;diff=1221&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-06-13T19:59:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;  So far, we have only looked at sentences with Subject-Verb-Complement(s) order. However, under certain circumstances English also permits sentences where some constituent th...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So far, we have only looked at sentences with Subject-Verb-Complement(s) order. However, under certain circumstances English also permits sentences where some constituent that normally appears after the subject appears before it. Here are some examples, with the name of the construction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Polar interrogative clauses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Did&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Lilly dance?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Has&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Lilly been dancing?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Topicalization clauses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Lilly&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Fido likes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Lilly&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; I think that Fido was speaking to.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Non-subject Wh-interrogative main clauses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Who&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; does Fido like?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Who&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; do you think that Fido was speaking to?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Non-subject Wh-interrogative subordinate clauses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I asked &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;who&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; Fido likes?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I asked &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;who&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; you think that Fido was speaking to?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though the following clauses display no overt displacement, they are both interrogative clauses and should therefore be analyzed together with the interrogative clauses above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Subject Wh-interrogative clauses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who likes Fido.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Who thinks that Fido was speaking to Lilly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Polar interrogative subordinate clauses&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I asked whether Fido likes Lilly&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I asked whether you think that Fido was speaking to Lilly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Necessary additions to the grammar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to analyze all the sentence types above, we need to add only 3 features, 2 grammatical rules, and a number of principles to the previous grammar:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The three new features&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Feature !! Value type!! Function of the feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| INV(erted) || &amp;#039;&amp;#039;boolean&amp;#039;&amp;#039; || Is the verb inverted (before the subject) or not?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|  WH || &amp;#039;&amp;#039;list(param)&amp;#039;&amp;#039; || List of the Wh-parameters a sign contains.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|  SLASH || &amp;#039;&amp;#039;list(loc)&amp;#039;&amp;#039; || List of the gaps a sign contains. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The extended architecture of signs therefore looks as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(24) on p. 19&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Gert</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>