Grammatical Functions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> | |||
<font size="3"> | |||
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions: | We distinguish four types of grammatical functions: | ||
The predicate | |||
The subject | # [[Predicate | The predicate]]<br> | ||
The complements | # [[Subject | The subject]]<br> | ||
The direct object | # [[Complements | The complements]]<br> | ||
The indirect object | ## [[Direct_Object | The direct object]]<br> | ||
The predicative complement | ## [[Indirect_Object | The indirect object]]<br> | ||
The oblique complement | ## [[Predicate_Complement | The predicative complement]]<br> | ||
## [[Oblique_Complement | The oblique complement]]<br> | |||
The differences can be accounted for using several criteria | # [[Modifiers_(Adjuncts) | Modifiers (Adjuncts)]]<br> | ||
Position in the structure | <br> | ||
The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP). | |||
The subject is external to the predicate. | === The differences can be accounted for using several criteria === | ||
Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate. | |||
The complements are sisters to V. | ==== Position in the structure ==== | ||
The modifiers are sisters to VP. | |||
Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements | * The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP). | ||
Pronominalization | * The subject is external to the predicate. | ||
A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier. | * Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate. | ||
*Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement) | * The complements are sisters to V. | ||
Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier) | * The modifiers are sisters to VP. | ||
Obligatoriness | * Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements | ||
Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb. | |||
Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).) | ==== Pronominalization ==== | ||
Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with. | * A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier. | ||
Uniqueness | * Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement) | ||
Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary | * Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier) | ||
Semantic autonomy | |||
The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb: | ==== Obligatoriness ==== | ||
Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning) | * Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb. | ||
Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position) | ** Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).) | ||
The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity. | * Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with. | ||
The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class. | |||
==== Uniqueness ==== | |||
* Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers. | |||
==== Semantic autonomy ==== | |||
* The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb: | |||
** Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning) | |||
** Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position) | |||
* The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity. | |||
* The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:36, 4 May 2017
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions:
The differences can be accounted for using several criteria
Position in the structure
- The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP).
- The subject is external to the predicate.
- Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate.
- The complements are sisters to V.
- The modifiers are sisters to VP.
- Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements
Pronominalization
- A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier.
- Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement)
- Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library is a modifier)
Obligatoriness
- Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
- Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).)
- Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with.
Uniqueness
- Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers.
Semantic autonomy
- The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb:
- Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning)
- Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position)
- The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity.
- The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class.