Grammatical Functions: Difference between revisions

From English Grammar
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Grammatical Functions
<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
<font size="3">
 
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions:
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions:
The predicate
The subject
The complements:
The direct object
The indirect object
The predicative complement
The oblique complement
The modifiers
The differences can be accounted for using several criteria:
Position in the structure:
The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP).
The subject is external to the predicate.
Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate.
The complements are sisters to V.
The modifiers are sisters to VP.
Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements
Pronominalization:
A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier.
*Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement)
Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier)
Obligatoriness:
Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).)
Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with.
Uniqueness:
Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary number.
Semantic autonomy:
The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb:
Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning)
Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position)
The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity.
The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class.


# [[Predicate  | The predicate]]<br>
# [[Predicate  | The predicate]]<br>
Line 43: Line 12:
## [[Oblique_Complement  | The oblique complement]]<br>
## [[Oblique_Complement  | The oblique complement]]<br>
# [[Modifiers_(Adjuncts)  | Modifiers (Adjuncts)]]<br>
# [[Modifiers_(Adjuncts)  | Modifiers (Adjuncts)]]<br>
<br>
=== The differences can be accounted for using several criteria ===
==== Position in the structure ====
* The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP).
* The subject is external to the predicate.
* Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate.
* The complements are sisters to V.
* The modifiers are sisters to VP.
* Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements
==== Pronominalization ====
* A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier.
* Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement)
* Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier)
==== Obligatoriness ====
* Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
** Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).)
* Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with.
==== Uniqueness ====
* Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers.
==== Semantic autonomy ====
* The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb:
** Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning)
** Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position)
* The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity.
* The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class.


<br>
<br>

Latest revision as of 13:36, 4 May 2017

We distinguish four types of grammatical functions:

  1. The predicate
  2. The subject
  3. The complements
    1. The direct object
    2. The indirect object
    3. The predicative complement
    4. The oblique complement
  4. Modifiers (Adjuncts)


The differences can be accounted for using several criteria

Position in the structure

  • The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP).
  • The subject is external to the predicate.
  • Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate.
  • The complements are sisters to V.
  • The modifiers are sisters to VP.
  • Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements

Pronominalization

  • A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier.
  • Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement)
  • Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library is a modifier)

Obligatoriness

  • Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
    • Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).)
  • Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with.

Uniqueness

  • Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers.

Semantic autonomy

  • The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb:
    • Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning)
    • Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position)
  • The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity.
  • The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class.