Grammatical Functions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<font size="3"> | <font size="3"> | ||
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions: | We distinguish four types of grammatical functions: | ||
# [[Predicate | The predicate]]<br> | # [[Predicate | The predicate]]<br> | ||
Line 46: | Line 12: | ||
## [[Oblique_Complement | The oblique complement]]<br> | ## [[Oblique_Complement | The oblique complement]]<br> | ||
# [[Modifiers_(Adjuncts) | Modifiers (Adjuncts)]]<br> | # [[Modifiers_(Adjuncts) | Modifiers (Adjuncts)]]<br> | ||
<br> | |||
=== The differences can be accounted for using several criteria === | |||
==== Position in the structure ==== | |||
* The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP). | |||
* The subject is external to the predicate. | |||
* Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate. | |||
* The complements are sisters to V. | |||
* The modifiers are sisters to VP. | |||
* Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements | |||
==== Pronominalization ==== | |||
* A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier. | |||
* Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement) | |||
* Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier) | |||
==== Obligatoriness ==== | |||
* Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb. | |||
** Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).) | |||
* Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with. | |||
==== Uniqueness ==== | |||
* Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers. | |||
==== Semantic autonomy ==== | |||
* The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb: | |||
** Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning) | |||
** Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position) | |||
* The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity. | |||
* The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class. | |||
<br> | <br> |
Latest revision as of 13:36, 4 May 2017
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions:
The differences can be accounted for using several criteria
Position in the structure
- The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP).
- The subject is external to the predicate.
- Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate.
- The complements are sisters to V.
- The modifiers are sisters to VP.
- Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements
Pronominalization
- A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier.
- Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement)
- Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library is a modifier)
Obligatoriness
- Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
- Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).)
- Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with.
Uniqueness
- Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers.
Semantic autonomy
- The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb:
- Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning)
- Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position)
- The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity.
- The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class.