Practical Grammar 4: Difference between revisions
| No edit summary | |||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| [PRED   'SEE<<span style="color: blue>SUBJ</span>,<span style="color: red>OBJ</span>,<span style="color: green>OBJ-TH</span>>'] | [PRED   'SEE<<span style="color: blue>SUBJ</span>,<span style="color: red>OBJ</span>,<span style="color: green>OBJ-TH</span>>'] | ||
| {| class="wikitable" | |||
| |- | |||
| | Example || Example || Example | |||
| |- | |||
| | Example || Example || Example | |||
| |- | |||
| | Example || Example || Example | |||
| |} | |||
| <br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 12 November 2020
Exercise 4
♣ Add the following test sentences to your grammar and tell the program that they are ungrammatical:
(1) *John [disappeared the hospital].
(2) *Martha [stayed the hospital].
(3) *Fred [resides].
(4) *Joe [saw Fred John].
(5) *John [sent Martha to a check].
(6) *We [gave Fred].
♣ Parse each sentence.
♣ Does the grammar make the right prediction?
♣ If not, formulate in grammatical terms what the problem seems to be.
The PRED feature and valence
Valence is the representation of the knowledge speakers have about what other kinds of constituents a word needs to combine with. You will remember from traditional grammar the distinction between intransitive and transitive verbs. These are just names for those verbs, respectively, which do not need a direct object (i.e. the verb disappear) and those which do (like see).
(1) 
John disappeared.
[PRED   'DISAPPEAR<SUBJ>']
(2) 
The bottle broke.
[PRED   'BREAK<SUBJ>']
(3) 
Joe saw Fred.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ>']
(4) 
Alice broke the bottle.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ>']
(5) 
John sent Martha a check.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ,OBJ-TH>']
(6) 
We gave Fred a wastebasket.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ,OBJ-TH>']
| Example | Example | Example | 
| Example | Example | Example | 
| Example | Example | Example |