Practical Grammar 4: Difference between revisions
| No edit summary | No edit summary | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Combining verbs and their direct object == | |||
| In the previous unit, we formulated the following annotated c-structure rule for NP: | |||
|  1. NP -> D N | |||
|  2. { | |||
|  3.  ↑=↓1; | |||
|  4.  ↑=↓2; | |||
|  5. } | |||
| == Exercise 4 == | == Exercise 4 == | ||
Revision as of 10:39, 14 November 2020
Combining verbs and their direct object
In the previous unit, we formulated the following annotated c-structure rule for NP:
1. NP -> D N
2. {
3.  ↑=↓1;
4.  ↑=↓2;
5. }
Exercise 4
♣ Add the following test sentences to your grammar and tell the program that they are ungrammatical:
(1) *John [disappeared the hospital].
(2) *Martha [stayed the hospital].
(3) *Fred [resides].
(4) *Joe [saw Fred John].
(5) *John [sent Martha to a check].
(6) *We [gave Fred].
♣ Parse each sentence.
♣ Does the grammar make the right prediction?
♣ If not, formulate in grammatical terms what the problem seems to be.
The PRED feature and valence
Valence is the representation of the knowledge speakers have about what other kinds of constituents a word needs to combine with. You will remember from traditional grammar the distinction between intransitive and transitive verbs. These are just names for those verbs, respectively, which do not need a direct object (i.e. the verb disappear) and those which do (like see).
(1) 
John disappeared.
[PRED   'DISAPPEAR<SUBJ>']
(2) 
The bottle broke.
[PRED   'BREAK<SUBJ>']
(3) 
Joe saw Fred.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ>']
(4) 
Alice broke the bottle.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ>']
(5) 
John sent Martha a check.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ,OBJ-TH>']
(6) 
We gave Fred a wastebasket.
[PRED   'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ,OBJ-TH>']
| PER | 3 | 
| NUM | sg | 
| DEF | - |