Practical Grammar 7: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Explaining the meaning of <span style="color: blue>(↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓</span> == | == Explaining the meaning of <span style="color: blue>(↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓</span> == | ||
The annotation on the PP looks a lot scarier than it actually is! Let us look at its structure piece by piece. To do this, we will | The annotation on the PP looks a lot scarier than it actually is! Let us look at its structure piece by piece. To do this, we will begin by looking at the annotations in the following rule one more time: | ||
1. VP → V DP | |||
1. | |||
2. { | 2. { | ||
3. | 3. ↑=↓1; | ||
4. | 4. (↑ OBJ) =↓1; | ||
5. } | 5. } | ||
Remember that the meaning of ↑ is "the mother's f-structure". Let f | |||
== Argument-marking prepositions == | == Argument-marking prepositions == |
Revision as of 16:38, 28 November 2020
Prepositional Phrases: explaining the complex annotation
The textbook contains a c-structure rule for VP like the following:
1. VP → V PP ↑=↓ (↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓
which translates into the following xlfg rule:
1. VP → V PP 2. { 3. ↑=↓1; 4. (↑ (↓2 PCASE)) = ↓2; 5. }
Explaining the meaning of (↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓
The annotation on the PP looks a lot scarier than it actually is! Let us look at its structure piece by piece. To do this, we will begin by looking at the annotations in the following rule one more time:
1. VP → V DP 2. { 3. ↑=↓1; 4. (↑ OBJ) =↓1; 5. }
Remember that the meaning of ↑ is "the mother's f-structure". Let f