Practical Grammar 9-Raising-Control: Difference between revisions
| (22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Let us investigate the meaning of these sentences first. 'buy' is a predicate that needs an AGENT and a PATIENT. The patient in each of the sentences above is mentioned directly: ''olives''. But who is the agent? As is shown by the following (not always natural sounding) paraphrases, in (1) and (3), Ingrid is understood to be the one buying olives and in (2) Fred is understood as the intended olive buyer | Let us investigate the meaning of these sentences first. 'buy' is a predicate that needs an AGENT and a PATIENT. The patient in each of the sentences above is mentioned directly: ''olives''. But who is the agent? As is shown by the following (not always natural sounding) paraphrases, in (1) and (3), Ingrid is understood to be the one buying olives and in (2) Fred is understood as the intended olive buyer | ||
( | (1b) '''Ingrid''' tried to bring it about that '''she (= Ingrid)''' buys olives.<br> | ||
( | (2b) Ingrid pursuaded '''Fred''' that '''he (= Fred)''' buys olives. <br> | ||
( | (3b) '''Ingrid''' promised Fred that '''she (= Ingrid)''' buys olives. | ||
Interestingly, even though a. there is an understood agent in each case and b. ''buy'' assigns the agent role to its subject, this subject cannot be expressed inside the infinitive. An attempt to add one, for instance as a pronoun leads to ungrammaticality: | |||
(1c) * Ingrid tried ['''she''' to buy olives] <br> | |||
(2c) * Ingrid pursuaded Fred ['''he''' to buy olives] <br> | |||
(3c) * Ingrid promised Fred ['''she''' to buy olives] | |||
As the examples above show, the understood subject of the infinitive is not always the same. That naturally raises the question of how the interpretation of the understood subject is determined. | |||
A little thought shows that the understood subject of the infinitive is determined by the (meaning of) the upper verb. When one tries or promises to do something, then one does so for an action that one will perform oneself. On the other hand, when one persuades somebody to do something, it is the pursuaded person that is supposed to perform the action, not the pursuader. The phenomenon that we witness here is called '''Control'''. We say that ''try'' and ''promise'' make their subject control the infinitive, whereas ''pursuade'' makes its the object to control the infinitive. | |||
These are the facts that we wish to capture in this unit. As always, we will need lexical entries and annotated phrase structure rules to accomplish that. Here are some guiding ideas to help you do that. | |||
== Guiding ideas == | |||
1. The infinitive marker '''to''' can be assumed to belong to part of speech '''I''' (for infinitive marker). <br> | |||
2. The infinitive ''buy'' is a new type of verb form for us. So far, all the verb forms that we encountered were tensed forms in the present and past tense, e.g. the third person singular present tense form ''buys'' or the non-third person singular present tense form ''buy'', as in ''I buy olives, you buy olives'', etc. Note that even though the non-third person singular tense forms and the infinitives of most verbs are homophonous (= are pronounced the same way), they must be kept distinct. They have different grammatical properteis and for some verbs, they are not homophonous. Note, for instance, ''I am, you are'' vs. ''to be''!<br> | |||
3. To separate these finite and infinitival verb forms from each other, we introduce a new feature called '''VFORM''', with the values '''FIN'' (= finite = tensed) and '''INF''' (= infinitive = non-tensed). There will eventually also be VFORM values for progressive verb forms like ''buying'' and participles like ''bought'', but we will not deal with those here.<br> | |||
4. As always, when we introduce a new kind of argument (in this case the infinitive), we need to specify a grammatical function for it. For tensed subordinate clauses we chose the grammatical function COMP (= complement clause). For infinitival complements we postulate the grammatical function '''XCOMP'''. The X stands for the unexpressed subject inside the infinitive complement. | |||
4. The most complex task is to encode the control behavior of the different verbs. We need statements to the effect that the subject (or object) of the higher verb controls (= is identical) to the subject of the XCOMP. For that, we need to add special equations to the lexical entries of control verbs, which are of the general form: | |||
(↑ GF) = (↑ XCOMP SUBJ); | |||
where GF is either SUBJ or OBJ. In the first case we get: | |||
(↑ SUBJ) = (↑ XCOMP SUBJ); | |||
This means, informally: my subject is identical to my XCOMP's SUBJ. In other words, this encodes subject control. Object control works the same. Remember to use the arrows from the XLFG editor rather than those from your keyboard! | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 53: | Line 73: | ||
In this unit, we will extend the grammar to license sentences with verbs like 'try' and 'seems' which have interesting properties. | In this unit, we will extend the grammar to license sentences with verbs like 'try' and 'seems' which have interesting properties. | ||
==''try | == Subject control: ''try''== | ||
Notation: | Notation: | ||
| Line 71: | Line 91: | ||
(1) Ingrid tried to buy olives. | (1) Ingrid tried to buy olives. | ||
<!-- | |||
[[File:Ingrid-tried-to-buy-olives-cs.JPG | 500px]] <br> | [[File:Ingrid-tried-to-buy-olives-cs.JPG | 500px]] <br> | ||
--> | |||
[[File:Ingrid-tried-to-buy-olives-fs.JPG | 1000px]] | [[File:Ingrid-tried-to-buy-olives-fs.JPG | 1000px]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 84: | Line 106: | ||
(2) Ingrid buys olives <br> | (2) Ingrid buys olives <br> | ||
(3) *Ingrid tried buys olives | (3) *Ingrid tried buys olives | ||
<__ | |||
==== <span style="color: blue>Exercise 6.1 Infinitives</span> ==== | |||
(4) Ingrid buys olives.<br> | |||
(5) Ingrid tried to buy olives <br> | |||
(6) * Ingrid tried buys olives <br> | |||
(7) Ingrid pursuaded Fred to buy olives <br> | |||
(8) * Ingrid pursuaded Fred bought olives <br> | |||
(9) Ingrid promised Fred to buy olives<br> | |||
(10) * Ingrid promised Fred buys olives<br> | |||
(11) * Ingrid tried she to buy olives <br> | |||
(12) * Ingrid pursuaded Fred he to buy olives <br> | |||
(13) * Ingrid promised Fred she to buy olives<br> | |||
Make sure that the following sentences come out to be ungrammatical: | |||
(14) * Ingrid tried to rain<br> | |||
(15) * Ingrid persuaded Fred to rain<br> | |||
(16) * Ingrid promised Fred to rain | |||
--> | |||
<!-- | |||
==''seem (Raising verb)''== | ==''seem (Raising verb)''== | ||
| Line 107: | Line 158: | ||
[[File:Ingrid-seemed-to-buy-olives-fs.JPG | 500px]] | [[File:Ingrid-seemed-to-buy-olives-fs.JPG | 500px]] | ||
==''persuade | --> | ||
==Object control: ''persuade''== | |||
''try'' and ''seem'' are subject control (raising verbs), because the controller of the lower subject is the higher '''subject'''. But, objects can control as well. One verb where that is the case is ''persuade''. | ''try'' and ''seem'' are subject control (raising verbs), because the controller of the lower subject is the higher '''subject'''. But, objects can control as well. One verb where that is the case is ''persuade''. | ||
| Line 117: | Line 170: | ||
(5) Ingrid persuaded Fred to buy olives. | (5) Ingrid persuaded Fred to buy olives. | ||
<!-- | |||
[[File:Ingrid-persuaded-Fred-to-buy-olives.cs.JPG | 1000px]] | [[File:Ingrid-persuaded-Fred-to-buy-olives.cs.JPG | 1000px]] | ||
--> | |||
[[File:Ingrid-persuaded-Fred-to-buy-olives.fs.JPG | 500px]] | [[File:Ingrid-persuaded-Fred-to-buy-olives.fs.JPG | 500px]] | ||
[[File:Ingrid-persuaded-Fred-to-buy-olives-as.JPG | 500px]] | [[File:Ingrid-persuaded-Fred-to-buy-olives-as.JPG | 500px]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 126: | Line 183: | ||
(2) Ingrid buys olives <br> | (2) Ingrid buys olives <br> | ||
(3) *Ingrid persuaded Fred buys olives | (3) *Ingrid persuaded Fred buys olives | ||
<!-- | |||
==''expect(Object raising verb)''== | ==''expect(Object raising verb)''== | ||
| Line 163: | Line 222: | ||
<!-- [[Practical_Grammar_10|'''Week 10''']] [[Practical_Grammar_11|'''Week 11''']] [[Practical_Grammar_12|'''Term Paper Project''']] --> | <!-- [[Practical_Grammar_10|'''Week 10''']] [[Practical_Grammar_11|'''Week 11''']] [[Practical_Grammar_12|'''Term Paper Project''']] --> | ||
--> | |||
Latest revision as of 07:54, 14 July 2026
Infinitives
Having dealt with complements in the form of NP, PP, and subordinate clauses, we now turn to infinitives. Here are a few typical examples:
(1) Ingrid tried [to buy olives]
(2) Ingrid pursuaded Fred [to buy olives]
(3) Ingrid promised Fred [to buy olives]
Let us investigate the meaning of these sentences first. 'buy' is a predicate that needs an AGENT and a PATIENT. The patient in each of the sentences above is mentioned directly: olives. But who is the agent? As is shown by the following (not always natural sounding) paraphrases, in (1) and (3), Ingrid is understood to be the one buying olives and in (2) Fred is understood as the intended olive buyer
(1b) Ingrid tried to bring it about that she (= Ingrid) buys olives.
(2b) Ingrid pursuaded Fred that he (= Fred) buys olives.
(3b) Ingrid promised Fred that she (= Ingrid) buys olives.
Interestingly, even though a. there is an understood agent in each case and b. buy assigns the agent role to its subject, this subject cannot be expressed inside the infinitive. An attempt to add one, for instance as a pronoun leads to ungrammaticality:
(1c) * Ingrid tried [she to buy olives]
(2c) * Ingrid pursuaded Fred [he to buy olives]
(3c) * Ingrid promised Fred [she to buy olives]
As the examples above show, the understood subject of the infinitive is not always the same. That naturally raises the question of how the interpretation of the understood subject is determined.
A little thought shows that the understood subject of the infinitive is determined by the (meaning of) the upper verb. When one tries or promises to do something, then one does so for an action that one will perform oneself. On the other hand, when one persuades somebody to do something, it is the pursuaded person that is supposed to perform the action, not the pursuader. The phenomenon that we witness here is called Control. We say that try and promise make their subject control the infinitive, whereas pursuade makes its the object to control the infinitive.
These are the facts that we wish to capture in this unit. As always, we will need lexical entries and annotated phrase structure rules to accomplish that. Here are some guiding ideas to help you do that.
Guiding ideas
1. The infinitive marker to can be assumed to belong to part of speech I (for infinitive marker).
2. The infinitive buy is a new type of verb form for us. So far, all the verb forms that we encountered were tensed forms in the present and past tense, e.g. the third person singular present tense form buys or the non-third person singular present tense form buy, as in I buy olives, you buy olives, etc. Note that even though the non-third person singular tense forms and the infinitives of most verbs are homophonous (= are pronounced the same way), they must be kept distinct. They have different grammatical properteis and for some verbs, they are not homophonous. Note, for instance, I am, you are vs. to be!
3. To separate these finite and infinitival verb forms from each other, we introduce a new feature called VFORM', with the values FIN (= finite = tensed) and INF (= infinitive = non-tensed). There will eventually also be VFORM values for progressive verb forms like buying and participles like bought, but we will not deal with those here.
4. As always, when we introduce a new kind of argument (in this case the infinitive), we need to specify a grammatical function for it. For tensed subordinate clauses we chose the grammatical function COMP (= complement clause). For infinitival complements we postulate the grammatical function XCOMP. The X stands for the unexpressed subject inside the infinitive complement.
4. The most complex task is to encode the control behavior of the different verbs. We need statements to the effect that the subject (or object) of the higher verb controls (= is identical) to the subject of the XCOMP. For that, we need to add special equations to the lexical entries of control verbs, which are of the general form:
(↑ GF) = (↑ XCOMP SUBJ);
where GF is either SUBJ or OBJ. In the first case we get:
(↑ SUBJ) = (↑ XCOMP SUBJ);
This means, informally: my subject is identical to my XCOMP's SUBJ. In other words, this encodes subject control. Object control works the same. Remember to use the arrows from the XLFG editor rather than those from your keyboard!
In this unit, we will extend the grammar to license sentences with verbs like 'try' and 'seems' which have interesting properties.
Subject control: try
Notation:
In the exercises of this unit, we will have to implement Control: this means that a GF of the higher verb and the SUBJ of the higher verb's XCOMP are identical.
In XLFG, this is written as follows:
- (↑SUBJ) = (↑XCOMP SUBJ); means: the SUBJ of the higher verb and the XCOMP's SUBJ are identical.
- (↑OBJ) = (↑XCOMP SUBJ); means: the OBJ of the higher verb and the XCOMP's SUBJ are identical.
Exercise 9.1
- Go to https://147.210.117.56.
- On the basis of pages 102-103 in the textbook, make all the additions to the grammar that are necessary to yield the following outputs for sentence (1):
(1) Ingrid tried to buy olives.
Implement the following grammatical assumptions:
- 'to' (the infinitive marker): assume that it is marked [IM:+].
- 'buy': [VFORM:INF]
Make sure that your grammar makes the correct predictions for the sentences below:
(2) Ingrid buys olives
(3) *Ingrid tried buys olives
<__
Exercise 6.1 Infinitives
(4) Ingrid buys olives.
(5) Ingrid tried to buy olives
(6) * Ingrid tried buys olives
(7) Ingrid pursuaded Fred to buy olives
(8) * Ingrid pursuaded Fred bought olives
(9) Ingrid promised Fred to buy olives
(10) * Ingrid promised Fred buys olives
(11) * Ingrid tried she to buy olives
(12) * Ingrid pursuaded Fred he to buy olives
(13) * Ingrid promised Fred she to buy olives
Make sure that the following sentences come out to be ungrammatical:
(14) * Ingrid tried to rain
(15) * Ingrid persuaded Fred to rain
(16) * Ingrid promised Fred to rain
-->
Object control: persuade
try and seem are subject control (raising verbs), because the controller of the lower subject is the higher subject. But, objects can control as well. One verb where that is the case is persuade.
Exercise 9.3
Make all the changes to your current grammar so that it licenses the representations below:
(5) Ingrid persuaded Fred to buy olives.
Make sure that your grammar makes the correct predictions for the sentences below:
(2) Ingrid buys olives
(3) *Ingrid persuaded Fred buys olives
-->