Constraint-based Syntax 2: Week 4: Difference between revisions

From English Grammar
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 185: Line 185:


-->
-->


<!--
<!--
Line 318: Line 279:
Navigation:  
Navigation:  
<div align="center">
<div align="center">
  [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2| '''Main page''']]  [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_1| '''Week 1''']]    [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_2| '''Week 2''']] &nbsp;&nbsp; [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_3| '''Week 3''']] &nbsp;&nbsp; Week4 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week5 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week6 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week7 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week8 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week9 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week10
  [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2| '''Main page''']]  [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_1| '''Week 1''']]    [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_2| '''Week 2''']] &nbsp;&nbsp; [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_3| '''Week 3''']] &nbsp;&nbsp; Week4 &nbsp;&nbsp; [[Constraint-based_Syntax_2:_Week_5| '''Week 5''']] &nbsp;&nbsp; Week6 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week7 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week8 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week9 &nbsp;&nbsp; Week10
</div>
</div>
</font>
</font>

Latest revision as of 10:02, 16 May 2017

Simplifying the Grammar of Ginzburg and Sag (2000)

Parts of Speech

Our online grammar uses the following type hierarchy for parts of speech (the values of the feature HEAD):

Part-of-speech-hierarchy-of-online-grammar.jpg

The hierarchy differs from that in GS in two ways:

  1. their type gerund is omitted (since we are not going to deal with gerunds in this class)
  2. the type adverb has been added.

The following table lists the parts of speech and some words belonging to them:

Type Full name Examples
v verb snore, like, must, to
c complementizer that, whether, if
a adjective big, new, red
p preposition to, of, with
n noun Lilly, she
d determiner the, a, any
adv adverb early, very, not

Head Features

The next table lists all the head features of all the parts of speech and explains their function:

Feature Value type Function of the feature
PRED(icative) boolean Is the sign predicative or not?
MOD(ification) mod-synsem Can the sign modify and if yes, what kind of synsem?
AGR (element) age What are the agreement features of the sign?
VFORM (verb form) vform What is the verb's verb form?
AUX (iliary) boolean Is the verb an auxiliary?
Neg(aged) boolean Is the verb negated?
CASE case What case does the nominal sign carry?
SPEC(ified) sem-obj What is the content of the noun specified by the determiner?
DEG(red) bool Is the adjective (phrase) specified by a degree adverb?
NOT boolean Is the adverb the negation not?
P(reposition)FORM form Which preposition is it?

The verb form hierarchy

The different verb forms that the framework makes available form another important aspect of the theory:

GS-p24-nr10.jpg

The table below gives an overview of all verb forms with examples:

Verb form Full name Examples
fin finite (indicative) is, must, dances, dance (non-third person singular), danced (past tense)
inf infinitive to (the infinitive marker)
base base form (= bare infinitive) be, dance, call
prp present participle being, dancing, calling
pfp perfect participle been, danced, given
pas passive participle invited, rumored, introduced

Valence

In Week 1 we saw that all signs carry the 3 valence features SUBJ, SPR, and COMPS, which are list-valued. Corresponding to each valence feature, there is a phrase type: hd-subj-ph, hd-spr-ph, and hd-comp-ph. As the names suggest, each phrase has a head daughter and additionally a SUBJ, SPR, or one or two COMPS daughters. The projection of these phrases is driven by the head daughter's valence features as illustrated in Week 1.

The linguistic objects on the valence lists (i.e. the valents) are of type synsem. In order to simplify the representations of the valents, we use the following abbreviations:

VP = a phrase of part of speech v which is COMPS <> , SPR <>, and SUBJ <synsem>

AP = a phrase of part of speech a which is COMPS <> , SPR <>, and SUBJ <synsem>

S = a phrase of part of speech v which is COMPS <>, SPR <>, and SUBJ <>

NP = a phrase of part of speech n which is COMPS <>

PP = a phrase of part of speech p which is COMPS <> , SPR <>, and SUBJ <>

This permits us to write valence lists like the following, where the information in the brackets further specify inflectional properties of the valents which should be self-explanatory:

Example SUBJ COMPS
snores <NP[nom]> <>
likes <NP[nom]> <NP[acc]>
put <NP> <NP[acc],PP>
persuade <NP> <NP[acc],VP[inf]>
afraid <NP> <PP>
of <> <NP[acc]>
that (C) <> <S[fin]>

Words

So far, we have introduced the following concepts:

  • Our grammar deals with signs which are either words or phrases.
  • Every sign belongs to a maximal part of speech, which may have features.
  • Signs also have the 3 valence attributes SUBJ, SPR, and COMPS which contain a description of the syntactic and semantic information of other signs.
  • These valence features drive the formation of specific phrases.

In preparation of a more detailed look at phrases, look at the lexical entries of the words in the table below in the online grammar. Where applicable, try out different inflectional forms, e.g. snores, snoring, snored or she, her. Pay attention to the part of speech, its features, and the 3 valence features of each word:

Online Grammar for Chapter 2: HPSG Background

Type Full name Examples
v verb snore, like, must, to
c complementizer that, whether, if
a adjective big, new, red
p preposition to, of, with
n noun Lilly, she
d determiner the, a, any
adv adverb early, very, not





Navigation:

 Main page    Week 1      Week 2     Week 3    Week4     Week 5    Week6    Week7    Week8    Week9    Week10