Grammatical Functions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<font size="3"> | <font size="3"> | ||
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions: | We distinguish four types of grammatical functions: | ||
Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
The differences can be accounted for using several criteria: | The differences can be accounted for using several criteria: | ||
Position in the structure: | |||
The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP). | * Position in the structure: | ||
The subject is external to the predicate. | ** The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP). | ||
Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate. | ** The subject is external to the predicate. | ||
The complements are sisters to V. | ** Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate. | ||
The modifiers are sisters to VP. | ** The complements are sisters to V. | ||
Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements | ** The modifiers are sisters to VP. | ||
Pronominalization: | ** Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements | ||
A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier. | * Pronominalization: | ||
*Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement) | ** A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier. | ||
Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier) | ** Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement) | ||
Obligatoriness: | ** Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library'' is a modifier) | ||
Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb. | |||
Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).) | * Obligatoriness: | ||
Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with. | ** Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb. | ||
Uniqueness: | *** Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).) | ||
Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary | ** Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with. | ||
Semantic autonomy: | |||
The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb: | * Uniqueness: | ||
Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning) | ** Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers. | ||
Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position) | |||
The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity. | * Semantic autonomy: | ||
The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class. | ** The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb: | ||
** Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning) | |||
** Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position) | |||
** The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity. | |||
** The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class. | |||
Revision as of 13:31, 4 May 2017
We distinguish four types of grammatical functions:
The differences can be accounted for using several criteria:
- Position in the structure:
- The predicate of a clause is the highest VP (or AuxP).
- The subject is external to the predicate.
- Complements and modifiers are both internal to the predicate.
- The complements are sisters to V.
- The modifiers are sisters to VP.
- Modifiers usually do not stand between the V and its complements
- Pronominalization:
- A pro-VP form such as do so cannot combine with a complement, but it can combine with a modifier.
- Pat put a book [on the shelf], and Mary did so into the drawer. (on the shelf is a complement)
- Pat read a book [in the library], and Mary did so at home. (in the library is a modifier)
- Obligatoriness:
- Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
- Note: complements can also be optional (Pat ate (shrimp).)
- Modifiers are syntactically optional. Their form and number is independent of the VP they combine with.
- Complements are syntactically obligatory. Their form and number is determined by the verb.
- Uniqueness:
- Every complement function can occur at most once with a given predicate. Modifiers can occur in arbitrary numbers.
- Semantic autonomy:
- The interpretation of complements is determined by the verb, the interpretation of modifiers is independent of the verb:
- Pat relies [on Kim]. (complement, on does not contribute any meaning)
- Pat lies [on the bed]. (locative modifier, on expresses a relative position)
- The existence or involvement of a complement is semantically implied by the specific verb. E.g. eat implies that some object is involved in the activity.
- The compatibility of a VP with a certain modifier is a property not of the particular verb, but of a larger verb class.