Practical Grammar 4: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
</div><br> | </div><br> | ||
== Exercise 3 == | |||
* Add appropriate TENSE, NUMBER, and PERSON features to all the verbs in the lexicon. | * Add appropriate TENSE, NUMBER, and PERSON features to all the verbs in the lexicon. |
Revision as of 11:06, 14 November 2020
Verbs and VPs
Next, we want to associate verbs and VPs with reasonable f-structures. As with NPs, we do this in two steps:
a. We add appropriate features to the lexical entries of verbs, and b. we add the correct annotation to the VP-rules, so that each node in the VP tree gets the desired f-structure.
Features of verbs
Let us look at the following sentences:
(1) I am happy. (2) They are happy. (3) I was happy.
Exercise
In the previous unit, we formulated the following annotated c-structure rule for combining a D and an N into NP:
1. NP -> D N 2. { 3. ↑=↓1; 4. ↑=↓2; 5. }
Let us now turn to the rule that combines a V and an NP into a VP:
VP -> V NP;
Exercise 1
State which feature the constrast between (1) and (3) motivates. What are the feature's possible values?
Check your answer
The feature is TENSE and its possible values are pres, past, future.
Exercise 2
State which features the constrast between (1) and (2) motivates. What are the features' possible values?
Check your answer
The contrast motivates two features:
a. The feature PERSON whose possible values are 1, 2, and 3.
b. The feature NUMBER whose possible values are sg and pl.
Exercise 3
- Add appropriate TENSE, NUMBER, and PERSON features to all the verbs in the lexicon.
♣ Add the following test sentences to your grammar and tell the program that they are ungrammatical:
(1) *John [disappeared the hospital].
(2) *Martha [stayed the hospital].
(3) *Fred [resides].
(4) *Joe [saw Fred John].
(5) *John [sent Martha to a check].
(6) *We [gave Fred].
♣ Parse each sentence.
♣ Does the grammar make the right prediction?
♣ If not, formulate in grammatical terms what the problem seems to be.
The PRED feature and valence
Valence is the representation of the knowledge speakers have about what other kinds of constituents a word needs to combine with. You will remember from traditional grammar the distinction between intransitive and transitive verbs. These are just names for those verbs, respectively, which do not need a direct object (i.e. the verb disappear) and those which do (like see).
(1)
John disappeared.
[PRED 'DISAPPEAR<SUBJ>']
(2)
The bottle broke.
[PRED 'BREAK<SUBJ>']
(3)
Joe saw Fred.
[PRED 'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ>']
(4)
Alice broke the bottle.
[PRED 'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ>']
(5)
John sent Martha a check.
[PRED 'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ,OBJ-TH>']
(6)
We gave Fred a wastebasket.
[PRED 'SEE<SUBJ,OBJ,OBJ-TH>']
PER | 3 |
NUM | sg |
DEF | - |