Practical Grammar CompClauses: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
# CPs take two daughers: a C and an IP. The two daughters are co-heads of the CP. | # CPs take two daughers: a C and an IP. The two daughters are co-heads of the CP. | ||
# You need to add a new VP rule which allows a VP to consist of a V and a CP. The CP bears the GF '''COMP'''. | # You need to add a new VP rule which allows a VP to consist of a V and a CP. The CP bears the GF '''COMP'''. | ||
# Complementizers have no PRED value. | |||
<span style="color: blue>Exercise 9 </span> | <span style="color: blue>Exercise 9 </span> |
Revision as of 06:56, 25 July 2025
Complement Clauses
Next, we come to the exciting topic of complement (= subordinate) clauses. Here are two examples:
(1) Fred thinks that Lilly disappeared
(2) Fred enquires whether Lilly disappeared
There is nothing really special about these structures. As with prepositional phrases, we need
- lexical items for the new verbs
- lexical items for the two complementizers that and whether
- two new phrase structure rules.
We make the following assumptions:
- that and whether belong to the part of speech C (= complementizer).
- Complementizers head CPs.
- CPs take two daughers: a C and an IP. The two daughters are co-heads of the CP.
- You need to add a new VP rule which allows a VP to consist of a V and a CP. The CP bears the GF COMP.
- Complementizers have no PRED value.
Exercise 9
Implement this analysis so that the grammar produces the output in the document Exercise-9-expected-output.pdf on Olat.