Practical Grammar 7: Difference between revisions

From English Grammar
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
* ↓2 refers to "the f-structure of daughter 2"
* ↓2 refers to "the f-structure of daughter 2"


So, in the tree licensed by the rule above ↑ is the VP's f-structure. Let us call that f<sub>VP</sub>. And ↓2 refers to the PP's f-structure. Let us correspondingly call that f<sub>PP</sub>.
So, in the tree licensed by the rule above ↑ is the VP's f-structure. Let us call that f<sub>VP</sub>. And ↓2 refers to the PP's f-structure. Let us correspondingly call that f<sub>PP</sub>. With that, the formula (↑ OBJ) =↓2 becomes
 
(f<sub>VP</sub> OBJ) = f<sub>PP</sub>


== Argument-marking prepositions ==
== Argument-marking prepositions ==

Revision as of 16:51, 28 November 2020

Prepositional Phrases: explaining the complex annotation

The textbook contains a c-structure rule for VP like the following:

1. VP → V          PP
       ↑=↓   (↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓

which translates into the following xlfg rule:

1. VP → V PP
2. {
3. ↑=↓1;
4. (↑ (↓2 PCASE)) = ↓2;
5. }


Explaining the meaning of (↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓

The annotation on the PP looks a lot scarier than it actually is! Let us look at its structure piece by piece. To do this, we will begin by looking at the annotations in the following rule one more time:

1. VP → V DP
2. {
3. ↑=↓1;
4. (↑ OBJ) =↓2;
5. }

Remember that by definition

  • ↑ is "the mother's f-structure" and
  • ↓2 refers to "the f-structure of daughter 2"

So, in the tree licensed by the rule above ↑ is the VP's f-structure. Let us call that fVP. And ↓2 refers to the PP's f-structure. Let us correspondingly call that fPP. With that, the formula (↑ OBJ) =↓2 becomes

(fVP OBJ) = fPP

Argument-marking prepositions

Semantic prepositions