Practical Grammar 7: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
This translates into the following graphical representation: | This translates into the following graphical representation: | ||
[OBJ f<sub>PP</sub>] | [OBJ [<sub>f<sub>PP</sub></sub>]] | ||
== Argument-marking prepositions == | == Argument-marking prepositions == |
Revision as of 17:06, 28 November 2020
Prepositional Phrases: explaining the complex annotation
The textbook contains a c-structure rule for VP like the following:
1. VP → V PP ↑=↓ (↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓
which translates into the following xlfg rule:
1. VP → V PP 2. { 3. ↑=↓1; 4. (↑ (↓2 PCASE)) = ↓2; 5. }
Explaining the meaning of (↑ (↓ PCASE)) = ↓
The annotation on the PP looks a lot scarier than it actually is! Let us look at its structure piece by piece. To do this, we will begin by looking at the annotations in the following rule one more time:
1. VP → V DP 2. { 3. ↑=↓1; 4. (↑ OBJ) =↓2; 5. }
Remember that by definition
- ↑ is "the mother's f-structure" and
- ↓2 refers to "the f-structure of daughter 2"
So, in the tree licensed by the rule above ↑ is the VP's f-structure. Let us call that fVP. And ↓2 refers to the PP's f-structure. Let us correspondingly call that fPP. With that, the formula (↑ OBJ) =↓2 becomes
(fVP OBJ) = fPP
Given the following:
(fVP OBJ) = the value of the attribute OBJ in the f-structure of the VP
(fVP OBJ) = fPP means:
The value of the attribute OBJ in the f-structure of the VP is the f-structure of the PP.
This translates into the following graphical representation:
[OBJ [fPP]]