Auxiliaries: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
# *Pat walked home and Mary walked, too. | # *Pat walked home and Mary walked, too. | ||
Special cases | === Special cases === | ||
* Modal auxiliaries: they only have tensed forms and take no -s in the third person singular present tense | * Modal auxiliaries: they only have tensed forms and take no -s in the third person singular present tense |
Latest revision as of 12:23, 21 April 2017
- Examples: may, can, will, shall, might, could
- English auxiliaries differ from verbs in that they show the following properties, the NICE properties:
Negation:
A finite auxiliary precedes the negation particle not to negate a sentence.
- Pat will not walk home.
- *Pat walked not home.
Inversion:
A finite auxiliary stands at the beginning of a sentence in yes/no-questions.
- Will Pat walk home?
- *Walked Pat home?
Contraction:
There is an idiosyncratic contraction form of the auxiliary and the negation particle. won't, can't
Ellipsis:
An auxiliary can occur in VP ellipsis, i.e. at the end of a sentence when a VP is missing.
- Pat should walk home and Mary might, too.
- *Pat walked home and Mary walked, too.
Special cases
- Modal auxiliaries: they only have tensed forms and take no -s in the third person singular present tense
- The infinitive marker to shows many properties of auxiliaries, and is considered an auxiliary in many theories of grammar.