Practical Grammar 9: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<span style="color: blue>Exercise 9 </span> | <span style="color: blue>Exercise 9 </span> | ||
1. Open Grammar 9<br> | 1. Open Grammar Grammar 9 - 2026-02-04<br> | ||
2. Implement the analysis for sentences (1)-(2) as described above.<br> | 2. Implement the analysis for sentences (1)-(2) as described above.<br> | ||
3. Parse. Your output should look exactly like the output decribed in the document Exercise-9-expected-output.pdf on Olat. | 3. Parse. Your output should look exactly like the output decribed in the document Exercise-9-expected-output.pdf on Olat. | ||
Revision as of 10:06, 4 February 2026
Complement Clauses
Next, we come to the exciting topic of complement (= subordinate) clauses. Here are two examples:
(1) Fred thought that Lilly disappeared
(2) Fred enquired whether Lilly disappeared
There is nothing really special about these structures. As with prepositional phrases, we need
- lexical items for the new verbs
- lexical items for the two complementizers that and whether
- two new phrase structure rules.
We make the following assumptions:
- that and whether belong to the part of speech C (= complementizer).
- A complementizer combines with a following S to form another S.
- The lower S is the head of the upper S.
- You need to add a new VP rule which allows a VP to consist of a V and an S. The S bears the GF COMP.
- Complementizers have no PRED value.
Exercise 9
1. Open Grammar Grammar 9 - 2026-02-04
2. Implement the analysis for sentences (1)-(2) as described above.
3. Parse. Your output should look exactly like the output decribed in the document Exercise-9-expected-output.pdf on Olat.