Practical Grammar 10: Difference between revisions
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
--> | --> | ||
<!-- | |||
The data above together with the data from Unit 9 illustrate the following generalizations: | The data above together with the data from Unit 9 illustrate the following generalizations: | ||
| Line 102: | Line 104: | ||
d. The verb ''buy'' can serve as the head of the complement of the control verb ''try'', but the verbs ''rain'' and ''arise'' cannot. In other words, you cannot embed a verb under ''try'' if that verb requires an expletive as its subject.<br> | d. The verb ''buy'' can serve as the head of the complement of the control verb ''try'', but the verbs ''rain'' and ''arise'' cannot. In other words, you cannot embed a verb under ''try'' if that verb requires an expletive as its subject.<br> | ||
e. All three verbs ''buy'', ''rain'' and ''arise'' can serve as the head of the complement of the raising verb ''seem''. | e. All three verbs ''buy'', ''rain'' and ''arise'' can serve as the head of the complement of the raising verb ''seem''. | ||
Revision as of 08:00, 23 June 2026
When it rains, it pours
Note the following sharp contrasts:
(1) It rained.
(2) *Ingrid rained
(3) There arose a storm
(4) *Ingrid arose a storm
What these examples show is that there are places where only meaningless expressions like it and there can occur in English, but not meaningful expressions like Ingrid or the cat. rain and similar words are called weather verbs and the construction in (3) has the name existential construction. This leads to the it of weather verbs being referred to as weather-it and the there in the existential construction as existential there. It is assumed that both expressions are meaningless and that the only subject th weather verbs permit is weather-it and the only subject that the existential construction tolerates is the existential there.
Note: for both of these meaningsless pronouns, there are pronouns spelled identically that are meaningful and in fact that is no coincidence: the meaningless pronouns developed historically from the meaningful ones in environments where their meaning came to be more and more bleached. As a consequence, we need two different lexical entries with the spelling it and two different ones for there as well.
Altogether, with respect to their subjects, there are three different verb classes in English:
1. 'Normal' verbs: they require a meaningful subject. They make up almost all verbs. Examples: sing, dance, put, tell, insult. 2. wheather-verbs: require wheather-it as their subject. Examples: rain, snowed, thunder. 3. Existential verbs: demand that their subject be the existential there. Examples: arise, be, arrive.
Implementation
It is actually fairly easy to implement these ideas in XLFG. We need the following:
a. A way of marking the distinction between words that do and do not have meaning b. To make sure that normal verbs only tolerate meaningful subjects. c. To find a way of making weather-verbs require their subject to be the meaningless weather-it and that the existential verbs require their subject to be the existential-there.
A
We already have a way to distinguish meaningful from meaningless nouns. Recall that we specify the meaning of a noun in its PRED value. To model a meaningless noun simply means to not give it a PRED value.
B
This is also straightforward: meaningful subjects are those which are assigned a semantic role in the verb's PRED value. Meaningless subjects are of course not assigned a semantic role. After all, since meaningless expressions do not refer to anything, there is nothing that could play that role in an event.
C
This is a little more involved and requires two theoretical innovations.
1. FORM values for meaningless it and there. The problem is that weather verbs ONLY tolerate the meaningless it as a subject and existential verbs ONLY the meaningless there. But, how can these verbs tell these two meaningless items apart? The answer is that we need to give these two nouns functional information that the verb can selects. This is what the new FORM feature is for. In their lexical entries, it is marked FORM:it and there is marked FORM:there. Meaningful items don't need the form feature.
2. The completeness and coherence conditions assume that all the grammatical functions in a verb's PRED value are assigned a thematic role. For the subjects of weather and existential verbs, however, that is precisely not the case. Therefore, these subjects have to be listed outside the verb's PRED value. The PRED value of rain, for instance, will then be: [PRED:'RAIN'<>SUBJ'] . Since rain has no meaningful dependent, the brackets after its meaning stay empty. The non-semantic subject is then listed after the brackets.
With this, we have all the pieces in place for the next excercise.
Exercise 11
1. Open Grammar Grammar 8
2. For all the words in the sentences below, add lexical entries if that is necessary.
3. Add these sentences as test items with their grammaticality status.
4. Parse.
(5) Ingrid bought olives
(6) *it bought olives
(7) *There bought olives
(6) it rained
(6) *Ingrid rained
(7) *there rained
(8) There arose a storm
(8) *Ingrid arose a storm
(9) *it arose a storm