Grammar Writing: Week 10

From English Grammar
Revision as of 13:01, 18 December 2017 by Gert (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= Identity = Last week, you were supposed to write a grammar that accepts different kinds of verb phrases. The rules you had to write all took the following form: # VP --> V...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Identity

Last week, you were supposed to write a grammar that accepts different kinds of verb phrases. The rules you had to write all took the following form:

  1. VP --> V, COMPS <NP> + NP
  2. VP --> V, COMPS <PP> + PP
  3. VP --> V, COMPS <AP> + AP
  4. VP --> V, COMPS + S

For NPs, APs, PPs you would also have to write several rules.

Clearly, the rules above are very similar, but they fail to express the similarity. This is shown by the fact that if there were a verb that wants to combine with a VP-complement, then we would would need to add another rule to the ones above, as follows:

  1. VP --> V, COMPS <VP> + VP

What our current grammars are missing to express the generalization covered by the five rules above is the concept of identity.