Practical Grammar
Review
If you need a review on parts of speech and phrases, then follow these links:
Syntactic Categories
S, NP, N, VP, V, PP, P, AP, A, D
Evidence for Syntactic Constituents
(Based on Radford (1988), Chapter 2)
Only phrasal constituents (i.e. whole phrases) can undergo Preposing
(1) I cant stand your elder sister.
(2)
a. Your elder sister I can’t stand.
b. * Your elder I can’t stand sister.
c. * Elder sister I can’t stand your.
d. * Sister I can’t stand your elder.
e. * Your I can’t stand elder sister.
Pronouns
Pronouns replace NPs
(6)
a. SPEAKER A: What do you think of [ NP
the [ N
guy] who wrote that unbelievably boring
book onTransformational Grammar]?
b. SPEAKER B: I can't stand [ NP him].
c. SPEAKER B: *I can't stand [ NP the [ N him] who wrote that unbelievably boring [ N book] onTransformational Grammar]
there replaces PPs
(8)
a. SPEAKER A: Have you ever been [ PP to Paris]?
b. SPEAKER B: No, I have never been [ PP there].
do so replaces VPs
(9) Lilly [ VP went home early].
(10)
a. Sandy [ VP did so] , too.
b. Sandy will [ VP do so], too.
c. Sandy might [ VP do so], too.
The S rule
In English, sentences typically consists of a
Exercise 1.1 Find constituents
Based on the the constituency tests, determine the constituency of the bracketed expressions in the following sentences. Use only the following syntactic categories: S, NP, N, VP, V, PP, P, AP, A, D.
Assume that sentences are created by the following rule, which says that an NP followed by a VP is an S (= sentence):
(1) John [disappeared].
(2) the bottle [broke].
(3) Martha [stayed at the hospital].
(4) Fred [talks about Chicago].
(5) Robert [went to the hospital].
(6) Alice [moved into the room].
(7) Joe [saw Fred].
(8) Alice [broke the bottle].
(9) we [moved it into the room].
(10) Fred [took Alice to the hospital].
(11) John [sent Martha a check].
(12) we [gave Fred a wastebasket].
Illustration
The constituent structure of (5) is the following:
[S [NP [N Robert]] [VP [V went] [PP [P to] [NP [D the] [N hospital]]]]].
You can create a visual representation of the tree at the following website:
To draw a tree for the structure above, paste it into the textfield of jsSyntaxTree. You can download the tree by clicking on it.
Evidence for the constituent structure of (5):
a. The words the hospital can be replaced by the pronoun it and the most important word is a noun. Hence, the hospital is an NP (= noun phrase).
b. The words to the hospital can be replaced by the proform there and the most important word is a preposition. Hence, to the hospital is a PP (= prepositional phrase).
c. The words went to the hospital can be replaced by the proform do so and the most important word is a verb. Hence, went to the hospital is a VP (= verb phrase).
d. The word Robert can be replaced by the pronoun he and it is a noun. Hence, it forms a single-word NP (= noun phrase).
e. Sentences consist of an NP followed by a VP. Since Robert is an NP and went to the hospital is a VP, Robert went to the hospital is an S (= sentence).
a. draw plausible phrase structure trees for each sentence. Assume that the bracketed expressions are VPs.
Draw the trees with the program at the following website:
Example: to draw a tree for sentence (12) above, paste the following line into the textfield of jsSyntaxTree:
[S [NP [N We]] [VP [V gave] [NP [N Fred]] [NP [D a] [N wastebasket]]]]
Download each tree by clicking on it.
Phrase Structure Rules
A phrase structure rule is well formed, if it is of one of the following forms
C0 -> C1
C0 -> C1 C2
C0 -> C1 C2 C3
and each C is one of the categories listed above.
b. Write the phrase structure rules needed to license the trees you drew.